As I was reading Robert Lane Greene and
Bryan A. Garner articles, I found it difficult to pick a side. I believe they
both have very valid points in which I agree in some and disagree in others. The
debate of how we should write has been going now for many years. Should you be
graded on whether someone likes how you write or not? Is this fair?
In my opinion every person has its own way
of writing, which is either good or bad. But still since I´ve been in fifth
grade I have been graded on a certain criteria. I believe that if you
understand what you are reading, it has a good grammar, and the ideas are clear
one should give that person a good grade even though you dint like his/her
style. Just because somebody doesn’t like the way you write, they shouldn’t give
you a bad grade. There’s a big difference between not liking the style of the
person or not being able to understand the persons writing. Lane states, “You give not just “right” or “wrong” rulings on usage, but often a 1-5
score, in which a given usage may be a 1 (definitely a mistake), 3 (common, but
…) or 5 (perfectly acceptable).” I agree
with this kind of grading system because for what sounds right for some, might
sound bad to others. It all depends from what perspective you see it: a
descriptivist or a prescriptivist. On this case Lane is a descriptivist since
he is arguing how “language is used.” What made me agree more with him was when
he said, “There is a set of standard conventions everyone
needs for formal writing and speaking. Except under unusual circumstances, you
should use the grammar and vocabulary of standard written English for these
purposes.” There is a basic rubric one has to follow to write, for example you can´t
write on a formal register and include slangs, since it would be inadequate.
But you can when you are using a familiar registration.
The fun part of writing is that everyone has its own style and way
of expressing themselves. Imagine how boring it would be if we all had to write
in the same style! Your writing is what represents you, so why should one be
limited and graded on how you write.
Rules are necessary in order for everyone to understand what you are trying to
say (to understand the what), but
there shouldn’t be a grading system of how
to express yourself.
One has the freedom of speech, meaning you can write whatever you want and which ever way you want (as long as the what is clear and easy to understand.)
One has the freedom of speech, meaning you can write whatever you want and which ever way you want (as long as the what is clear and easy to understand.)
Important
terms:
Descriptivist: describing “language as it
is used.”
Prescriptivist: focusing “on how language
should be used.”
Dogmatic: characterized by or given to the expression of
opinions very strongly or positively as if they were fact
No comments:
Post a Comment