WOW! Winston Churchill, another man who has
a talent at hiding fallacies. I do have to admit that I’m a bit jealous of
their ability of doing so. If it wasn’t because I have been doing a close
reading to the speeches I would have been convince by him, as well as by Orwell
and Gandhi.
Tautology is used a lot! Some examples that
I found was when he states, “...they shall do so with their eyes open, and not be led
blind fold into a trap,” and “Unhappily all that
influence, and it is an enormous influence, has been cast the other way.” One
might not realize it at first sight, but Churchill is repeating himself by
using different words.
A clear common
fallacy that I found was when he states the following question, “Why should these unpracticed, unproved, unrepresentative,
self-chosen groups of Indian politicians disdain the immense possibilities
offered within the limits of the Statutory Commission´s report, and demand an
immediate setting up of a United States of India, with themselves in control,
and the British army at their orders?”
Phewwww that was a long question! How many issues were merged into one? Obviously more than two. Such a long question makes us wonder on what Churchill is going to talk about. Which issues are more important? Sneaky Churchill, he just wants to make sure that he is confusing and tricking us.
Phewwww that was a long question! How many issues were merged into one? Obviously more than two. Such a long question makes us wonder on what Churchill is going to talk about. Which issues are more important? Sneaky Churchill, he just wants to make sure that he is confusing and tricking us.
Another one that I found was the
fallacy of the false dilemma when he states, “But win or lose, we must do our
duty.” Right here Churchill is only giving us two choices: either to win or
lose. But isn’t there an in between? I don’t know about you, but I have heard
of the term agreement, in which neither side wins or loses.
No comments:
Post a Comment